SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF INVASIVE AND NONINVASIVE TESTING FOR RISK OF SUDDEN-DEATH IN WOLFF-PARKINSON-WHITE SYNDROME

[摘要] Invasive electrophysiologic testing and noninvasive testing were compared as methods for identifying patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome at risk for sudden death. Sixty-seven patients were studied, including nine with a history of ventricular fibrillation. Electrophysiologic testing, using the shortest interval between consecutive pre-excited beats (shortest RR interval) .ltoreq. 250 ms during induced atrial fibrillation to define risk, identified seven of nine patients with previous ventricular fibrillation. The sensitivity increased to 87.5% if one patient with prior amiodarone therapy was excluded. Electrophysiologic testing had a specificity of 48.3% and a low predictive accuracy (18.9%) when using the shortest RR interval (< 250 ms) to identify the risk for sudden death. Continuous pre-excitation after disopyramide (2 mg/kg body weight, intravenously) had a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 26.1% and predictive accuracy of 12.8% for identifying patients with sudden death. Continuous pre-excitation during an exercise test identified these patients with a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 28.6% and a predictive accuracy of 11.8%. These noninvasive tests could also be used to predict the shortest RR interval observed during induced atrial fibrillation. Continuous pre-excitation on both tests used in combination had a sensitivity of 91.2%, a specificity of 66.7% and a predictive accuracy of 75.6% for predicting the shortest RR interval .ltoreq. 250 ms. Thus, both invasive and noninvasive techniques have a good sensitivity but a low specificity for identifying patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and sudden death. Slow ventricular rates during atrial fibrillation and block of accessory pathway conduction by noninvasive methods are associated with a low risk of sudden death.

[发布日期] 1987-08-01