Online modules to improve health professionals’ end-of-life law knowledge and confidence: a pre-post survey study

[摘要] BackgroundHealth professionals and medical students have knowledge gaps about the law that governs end-of-life decision-making. There is a lack of dedicated training on end-of-life law and corresponding research on the impact of this type of training.ObjectiveTo examine the impact of online training modules on key concepts of end-of-life law on Australian health professionals’ legal knowledge and their self-reported confidence in applying the law in practice.MethodsOnline pre- and post-training surveys were completed by training participants. The optional surveys collected demographic data, directly assessed legal knowledge and measured self-reported confidence in applying the law in clinical practice, before and after training.ResultsSurvey response rates were 66% (pre-training) and 12% (post-training). The final sample for analysis (n = 136 participants with matched pre- and post-training surveys), included nurses, doctors, allied health professionals, medical students and a small number of non-health professionals. Following completion of the online training modules, legal knowledge scores significantly increased overall and across each domain of end-of-life law. Participants were also more confident in applying the law in practice after training (median = 3.0, confident) than before training (median = 2.0, not confident).ConclusionsThis study found that completion of online training modules on end-of-life law increased Australian health professionals’ legal knowledge and self-reported confidence in applying the law in clinical practice. Participants demonstrated some remaining knowledge gaps after training, suggesting that the training, while effective, should be undertaken as part of ongoing education on end-of-life law. Future research should examine longer term outcomes and impacts of the training.

[发布日期] 2023-10-17

[关键词] Allied health occupations;Health legislation;Medicine;Nursing;Online learning;Palliative care;Survey methods