已收录 268921 条政策
 政策提纲
  • 暂无提纲
Impact of informed-choice invitations on diabetes screening knowledge, attitude and intentions: an analogue study
[摘要] BackgroundDespite concerns that facilitating informed choice would decrease diabetes screening uptake, 'informed choice' invitations that increased knowledge did not affect attendance (the DICISION trial). We explored possible reasons using data from an experimental analogue study undertaken to develop the invitations. We tested a model of the impact on knowledge, attitude and intentions of a diabetes screening invitation designed to facilitate informed choices.Methods417 men and women aged 40-69 recruited from town centres in the UK were randomised to receive either an invitation for diabetes screening designed to facilitate informed choice or a standard type of invitation. Knowledge of the invitation, attitude towards diabetes screening, and intention to attend for diabetes screening were assessed two weeks later.ResultsAttitude was a strong predictor of screening intentions (β = .64, p = .001). Knowledge added to the model but was a weak predictor of intentions (β = .13, p = .005). However, invitation type did not predict attitudes towards screening but did predict knowledge (β = -.45, p = .001), which mediated a small effect of invitation type on intention (indirect β = -.06, p = .017).ConclusionsThese findings may explain why information about the benefits and harms of screening did not reduce diabetes screening attendance in the DICISION trial.
[发布日期] 2010-12-17 [发布机构] 
[效力级别]  [学科分类] 
[关键词] Standardize Root Mean Square Residual;Informed Choice;Screening Uptake;General Medical Council;Diabetes Screening [时效性] 
   浏览次数:3      统一登录查看全文      激活码登录查看全文