已收录 268921 条政策
 政策提纲
  • 暂无提纲
To compare volumetric dimensions of pharyngeal airway for different dentofacial skeletal patterns –, Cone beam computed tomography
[摘要] After a century of controversies, we are still not certain on the relationship between airway dimensions and facial morphology. Objective: The objective of the study was to measure nasopharyngeal airway dimensions and compare it among different skeletal patterns. Materials and Methods: Forty-five cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients between 16 and 25 years were used in the study. The nasopharyngeal airway was divided into upper, middle, and lower segments. CBCT images were grouped into skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III. Results: There is no statistically significant difference between all the three groups for mean height of the upper, middle, and lower pharyngeal airways ( P = 0.303, 0.479, and 0.077, respectively). There is no statistically significant difference between all the three groups for mean width of the upper, middle, and lower pharyngeal airways indicated by P = 0.643, 0.791, and 0.99, respectively. There is no statistically significant difference between all the three groups for mean breadth of the upper, middle, and lower pharyngeal airways ( P = 0.939, 0.48, and 0.068, respectively). Furthermore, the mean total height of pharyngeal airway in Class I, Class II, and Class III groups indicates no statistically significant difference ( P = 0.097). Conclusion: Nasopharyngeal airway dimensions seem to play no role in different skeletal patterns.
[发布日期]  [发布机构] 
[效力级别]  [学科分类] 
[关键词] Cone-beam computed tomography;dimensions;pharyngeal airway [时效性] 
   浏览次数:1      统一登录查看全文      激活码登录查看全文