已收录 268922 条政策
 政策提纲
  • 暂无提纲
Editor’s response
[摘要] I thank Dr Needham and Dr Perkins for their letters. I agree that practices need to adopt appointment systems that can allow for continuity of care. There has been intense political pressure to prioritise access and it has certainly been mandated through past policy initiatives. I’ve no doubt that this is felt keenly by practices and, of course, access is a matter of great concern to patients, particularly when resources are scarce. I have considerable sympathy for any practice and partners trying to balance such competing demands at a time where demand significantly outstrips capacity.The cover photo of the November issue used a stock photo that we understand shows a consultation in French general practice with an employee of a municipal health centre. Research in the BJGP showed, against expectations perhaps, that overall locum use in England has changed little in recent years though there was considerable variability in regions.1 I would be deeply reluctant to attribute any blame to GP colleagues, whether partners, salaried, or locum, for the current crisis in general practice.© British Journal of General Practice 2022REFERENCE 1.↵Grigoroglou C, Walshe K, Kontopantelis E, et al. (2022) Locum doctor use in English general practice: analysis of routinely collected workforce data 2017–2020. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0311.
[发布日期]  [发布机构] 
[效力级别]  [学科分类] 卫生学
[关键词]  [时效性] 
   浏览次数:1      统一登录查看全文      激活码登录查看全文