已收录 272442 条政策
 政策提纲
  • 暂无提纲
Causes of variation in intrinsic ankle stiffness and the consequences for standing
[摘要] Previous studies have shown that the intrinsic mechanical stiffness of the ankles is less than necessary to fully stabilize the body in the upright position (Loram and Lakie, 2002a; Morasso and Schieppati, 1999; Morasso and Sanguineti, 2002; Casadio et al., 2005). Following these studies, research about the controlling mechanisms of standing (the maintenance of an upright posture by a combination of intrinsic and active mechanisms) has developed considerably (Lakie et al., 2003; Loram et al., 2005a,b, 2011; Masani et al., 2006; Maurer and Peterka, 2005; Peterka, 2002). However, very little attention was given to the intrinsic mechanisms themselves. Here I tackled this issue by manipulating the ankle (and its surrounding tissues) in various ways. The objective was to investigate ankle stiffness dependency on mechanical properties that are particular to muscles and tendons. Within-individual differences were confirmed in various conditions. I have shown that in standing, intrinsic ankle stiffness is affected by movement amplitude and history of movement, as well as active ankle torque and passive tendon stretch. I have found no dependency of ankle stiffness on localized cooling. With regards to the effect that differences in intrinsic ankle stiffness may cause to standing sway, a between-individual analysis showed an inverse correlation between ankle stiffness and sway magnitude.
[发布日期]  [发布机构] University:University of Birmingham;Department:School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences
[效力级别]  [学科分类] 
[关键词] R Medicine;RC Internal medicine;RC1200 Sports Medicine [时效性] 
   浏览次数:7      统一登录查看全文      激活码登录查看全文