We construct a ∏11 equivalence relation E on ωω for which there is no largestE-thin, E-invariant ∏11 subset of ωω. Then we lift our result to the general case.Namely, we show that there is a ∏12n+1 equivalence relation for which there isno largest E-thin, E-invariant ∏12n+1 set under projective determinacy. Thisanswers an open problem raised in Kechris [Ke2].
Our second result in this thesis is a representation for thin ∏13 equivalencerelations on uω. Precisely, we show that for each thin ∏13 equivalence relationE on uω, there is a Δ13 in the codes map p: ωω → uω and a ∏13 in the codesequivalence relation e on uω such that for all real numbers x and y,
xEy ↔ (p(x),p(y))∈ e
This lifts Harrington's result about thin ∏11 equivalence relations to thin ∏13equivalence relations.