Comparison between a typical and a simplified model for blast load-induced structural response

[摘要] As explosive blasts continue to cause severe damage as well as victims in both civil and military environments. There is a bad need for understanding the behavior of structural elements to such extremely short duration dynamic loads where it is of great concern nowadays. Due to the complexity of the typical blast pressure profile model and in order to reduce the modelling and computational efforts, the simplified triangle model for blast loads profile is used to analyze structural response. This simplified model considers only the positive phase and ignores the suction phase which characterizes the typical one in simulating blast loads. The closed from solution for the equation of motion under blast load as a forcing term modelled either typical or simplified models has been derived. The considered herein two approaches have been compared using the obtained results from simulation response analysis of a building structure under an applied blast load. The computed error in simulating response using the simplified model with respect to the typical one has been computed. In general, both simplified and typical models can perform the dynamic blast-load induced response of building structures. However, the simplified one shows a remarkably different response behavior as compared to the typical one despite its simplicity and the use of only positive phase for simulating the explosive loads. The prediction of the dynamic system responses using the simplified model is not satisfactory due to the obtained larger errors as compared to the system responses obtained using the typical one.

[发布机构] Faculty of Engineering at Mataria, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt^1;Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Egyption Chinese University, Egypt^2;Department of Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia^3

[效力级别] 数学

[关键词] Building structure;Computational effort;Equation of motion;Military environment;Response behavior;Simulation response;Structural elements;Structural response