Representability of Hom Implies Flatness
[摘要] Let ð‘‹ be a projective scheme over a noetherian base scheme ð‘†, and let $mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on ð‘‹. For any coherent sheaf $mathcal{E}$ on ð‘‹, consider the set-valued contravariant functor $hom_{(mathcal{E},mathcal{F})}$ on ð‘†-schemes, defined by $hom_{(mathcal{E},mathcal{F})}(T)=mathrm{Hom}(mathcal{E}_T,mathcal{F}_T)$ where $mathcal{E}_T$ and $mathcal{F}_T$ are the pull-backs of $mathcal{E}$ and $mathcal{F}$ to $X_T=X×_s T$. A basic result of Grothendieck ([EGA], III 7.7.9) says that if $mathcal{F}$ is flat over 𑆠then $hom_{(mathcal{E},mathcal{F})}$ is representable for all $mathcal{E}$.We prove the converse of the above, in fact, we show that if ð¿ is a relatively ample line bundle on ð‘‹ over 𑆠such that the functor $hom_{(L^{-n},mathcal{F})}$ is representable for infinitely many positive integers ð‘›, then $mathcal{F}$ is flat over ð‘†. As a corollary, taking $X=S$, it follows that if $mathcal{F}$ is a coherent sheaf on 𑆠then the functor $Tmapsto H^0(T,mathcal{F}_T)$ on the category of ð‘†-schemes is representable if and only if $mathcal{F}$ is locally free on ð‘†. This answers a question posed by Angelo Vistoli.The techniques we use involve the proof of flattening stratification, together with the methods used in proving the author's earlier result (see [N1]) that the automorphism group functor of a coherent sheaf on 𑆠is representable if and only if the sheaf is locally free.
[发布日期] [发布机构]
[效力级别] [学科分类] 数学(综合)
[关键词] Flattening stratification;ð‘„-sheaf;group-scheme;base change. [时效性]