This is the second in a series of three papers discussing significant modifications expected to be included in the 2000 NEHRP Provisions, dealing with the design of precast, prestressed concrete seismic-force-resisting systems. These modifications are expected to be part of the 2003 edition of the International Building Code.
1. Federal Emergency Management Agency, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, 1997 Edition, FEMA 302, February 1998; and Commentary, FEMA 303, Washington D.C., February 1998.
2. ACT Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (318-99) and Commentary (3l8R-99),�? American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, June 1999.
3. Restrepo, J. I., Park, R., and Buchanan, A. H., “Tests on Connections of Earthquake Resisting Precast Reinforced Concrete Perimeter Frames of Buildings,�? PCI JOURNAL, V. 40, No. 4, July-August 1995, pp. 44-61.
4. Restrepo, J. I., Park, R., and Buchanan, A. H., “Design of Connections of Earthquake Resisting Precast Reinforced Concrete Perimeter Frames,�? PCI JOURNAL , V. 40, No. 5, September-October 1995,pp. 68 -77 .
5. Yoshioka, K., and Sekine, M., “Experimental Study of Prefabricated Beam-Column Subassemblages,�? ACT SP 123, Design of Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 1991, pp. 465-492.
6. Kurose, Y., Nagami, K., and Saito, Y., “Beam-Column Joints in Precast Concrete Construction in Japan,�? ACT SP 123, Design of Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 1991, pp. 493-5 14.
7. Yee, A. A., “Design Considerations for Precast Prestressed Concrete Building Structures in Seismic Areas,�? PCI JOURNAL, V. 36, No. 3, May-June 1991, pp. 40-55.
8. Warnes, C. E., “Precast Concrete Connection Details for All Seismic Zones,�? Concrete International, V. 14, No. 11, November 1992, pp. 36-44.
9. Cheok, G. S., and Lew, H. S., “Performance of Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Subject to Cyclic Loading,�? PCI JOURNAL, V. 36, No.4, July-August 1991, pp. 56-67.
10. Cheok, G. S., Stone, W. C., and Kunnath, S. K., “Seismic Response of Precast Concrete Frames with Hybrid Connections," ACI Structural Journal, V. 95, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 527-539.
11. Stanton, J. F., Stone, W. C., and Cheok, G. S., “A Hybrid Reinforced Precast Frame for Seismic Regions,�? PCI JOURNAL, V. 42, No. 2, March-April 1997, pp. 20-32.
12. Priestley, M. J. N., “Overview of PRESSS Research Program,�? PCI JOURNAL, V. 36, No. 4, July-August 1991, pp. 50-57.
13. Priestley, M. J. N., “The PRESSS Program �? Current Status and Proposed Plans for Phase III,�? PCI JOURNAL, V. 41, No. 2, March-April 1996, pp. 22-40.
14. Priestley, M. J. N., Sritharan, S., Conley, J. R., and Pampanin, S., “Preliminary Results and Conclusions from the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Concrete Test Building,�? PCI JOURNAL, V. 44, No. 6, November-December 1999, pp. 42-67.
15. ACT Innovation Task Group 1 and Collaborators, “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing,�? American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1999.
16. Seo, S-Y., Lee, L-H., and Hawkins, N. M., “The Limiting Drift and Energy Dissipation Ratio for Shear Walls Based on Structural Testing," Journal of the Korean Concrete Institute, V. 10, No. 6, December 1998, pp. 273-311.
