Modification, elaboration and empirical evaluation of the Burger learning potential structural model

[摘要] ENGLISH ABSTRACT: South Africa‟s social political past that was led by the Apartheid system has deprived the majority of South Africans of the opportunity to develop and accumulate human capital. As a result, this political system has left this country with a range of challenges including; a shortage of critical skills in the marketplace, high unemployment and poverty rates, inequality in terms of income distribution, unequal racial representation in the workplace, together with other social challenges such as high crime rates, extensive poverty, horrendous living conditions and a consequent increasing dependence on social grants (Van Heerden, 2013). These challenges prohibit this country from realising its global competitive potential.Organisations are primarily affected by these struggles faced by the country, and their continuous fight with these legacies of Apartheid is especially evident when they try to comply with the two responsibilities that form part of the personnel selection function. These include their responsibility to (1) employ the „best‟ employee for the job to result in the production of products and services of high economic utility, and (2) to act under moral, economic, political and legal pressure to diversify their workforce (Theron, 2009). Due to South Africa‟s past political system, the majority previously disadvantaged individuals have underdeveloped job competency potential which currently prohibits them from succeeding in the world of work. Consequently, if organisations try to comply with their first responsibility, the process of selecting the „best‟ employee results in adverse impact. If organisations comply with their second responsibility through traditional affirmative action measures, they allow incompetent employees to be appointed. The incompetence is not due to one race having fundamentally less competency potential then another. It is because South Africa‟s intellectual capital is not, and has not been uniformly developed and distributed across races (Burger, 2012). This current situation faced by organisations should be dealt with for three important reasons. Firstly, a solution could improve the global competitiveness of this country. Secondly, a solution could contribute to solving the social challenges faced by this country, and lastly, not only because the situation could possible become precarious, but simple because it is the right thing to do.It is not implied that affirmative action should be abolished. This study rather suggests that the interpretation of affirmative action should change and the focus of this corrective policy should shift to a more developmental approach. This entails that more emphasis should be placed on providing the previously disadvantaged with the necessary training and development to foster the needed competency potential to succeed in the world of work. However, resources for these developmental opportunities are scarce, and as a result, a need exist to identify a method that could identify individuals who will gain maximum benefit from these suggested affirmative development opportunities. Consequently, a need exist to identify individuals who display the highest potential to learn and to create the conditions conducive for learners with high learning potential to actualise that potential. In order to successfully identify the individuals who display a high level of learning potential and to create the person- and environmental characteristics that have to be present to facilitate successful learning, the learning potential construct must be understood. De Goede (2007), Burger (2012), and Van Heerden (2013) have completed research studies on this specific construct, and to assist in the understanding of the complexity of this construct, it made more empirical sense to build on existing structural models. This should result in the production of a more complete understanding of learning and the determinants of learning performance.The objective of this study was therefore to modify and elaborate the Burger (2012) learning potential structural model by expanding the model with the inclusion of additional non-cognitive variables. The proposed hypothesised learning potential structural model was empirically evaluated. The measurement model achieved good close fit. However, the first analysis of the structural model only obtained reasonable model fit. After the consideration of the full range of fit indices, standardised residuals, modification indices and parameter estimates, a few modifications were made to the model. The final revised structural model achieved good fit. All of the paths in the final model were empirically corroborated.The limitations of the research methodology, the practical implications of this study, and recommendations for future research are also discussed.

[发布机构] Stellenbosch University