已收录 273620 条政策
 政策提纲
  • 暂无提纲
Hepatitis B vaccination
[摘要] We were pleased to hear of another primary health care team actively vaccinating intravenous drug users against hepatitis B.1 We have also found hepatitis B vaccination in primary care to be feasible and effective, but we have modified our practice through a number of audit cycles. We provide an outreach service to homeless patients in Leicester and we began by offering bloodborne virus screening to all intravenous drug users before offering vaccination on the traditional 0, 1- and 6-month schedule. We audited the outcomes for all drug users starting a methadone treatment programme over a 6-month period. The first audit of 23 patients treated in the 6 months to September 2000 found that only 48% were screened; nearly all of our patients are long-term intravenous users and gaining venous access is often difficult. This delayed vaccination so that only 65% received it. As a result we decided to offer opportunistic vaccination if screening was not achieved after 8 weeks, a computer prompt was set up at the start of each treatment programme to remind the clinician at each consultation. Our second audit of 31 patients starting treatment in the 6 months to September 2001 found that 97% had received the hepatitis B vaccine during the audit period but only half had completed three doses. Bloodborne virus screening had been performed for 65% of patients with another 32% screened elsewhere (e.g. criminal justice system or genitourinary medicine clinic.) Forty-five per cent of our intravenous drug-using patients were positive for hepatitis C. As a result of this audit we decided on three modifications to our practice; we would use combination hepatitis A and B vaccine on the grounds that nearly half of our patients were hepatitis C-positive, even if they did not yet know it, and so would warrant hepatitis A protection, and we decided to use the accelerated schedule with doses given at 0, 7 days, 21 days and 12 months, starting the schedule opportunistically at the first contact without waiting for blood screening. Our argument was that giving the vaccination to patients who had already had hepatitis A or B disease would not be harmful. Instead the vaccine would only be ineffective, but delay for unsuccessful blood screening could leave patients exposed to risk. Our third audit of 22 patients starting treatment in the 6 months to September 2002 found that 20 (91%) received three doses of vaccine with two patients declining consent to vaccination. However, we had increased vaccination uptake at the expense of blood screening; only 68% of this group of patients had had bloodborne virus screening in the previous 2 years. The most recent audit of 31 patients treated in the 6 months to September 2003 showed that we had maintained a high level of vaccination with 27 (87%) having 3 or more doses of hepatitis B vaccine and 26 (84%) fully vaccinated against hepatitis A. During this period we had also increased the rate of bloodborne virus screening to 81%.
[发布日期]  [发布机构] 
[效力级别]  [学科分类] 卫生学
[关键词]  [时效性] 
   浏览次数:2      统一登录查看全文      激活码登录查看全文