A study of functionalist theories in architecture
[摘要] This thesis is an analysis of functionalist theories and not of functionalists themselves. I will determine what thetheories cover hoping to clear up to some extent the misunderstandings and limited aspects pertaining to the theories.Functionalism is the underlying order in architecture. It embodies and synthesizes the life principle with the universal laws of science; it humanizes architecture and gives it meaning.These thoughts are constantly recurring in the writing of the functionalists, who did not disregard imaginationbut sought to give it order and meaning in relation to man's physical, intellectual and spiritual needs.The main lesson we can learn from the functionalistsis not what they did so much as what they said. Functionalism is not an object, it is a philosophy; a basis for architecture. No one building can be held up as the perfect embodiment offunctionalist principles and many (done by functionalists) are quite bad. Start with first hand knowledge rather than second hand experience; that knowledge based on inductive reason and the sense experiences.The conscious following of rules is the surest way tokill freshness. Principles should be fused into the subconscious element of our thought and become one with feeling andintuition; an integral part of our everyday experiences.The functionalists are concerned with the rational approach emphasizing the physical needs of man because this approachis easily explained and demonstrated. The metaphysical aspects of the intellect and spirit are less satisfying since it is impossible to ;;drive a point home;; with a conclusive example. The functionalists repeatedly allude to the intellectual and spiritual needsof man but in compliance with the physical needs.The main difference between functionalism and formalism (form for form's sake) is that through functionalism expression and delight evolve in accordance with the total needs of man. Whereas formalism is an end in itself, compromising the needs of man.
[发布日期] [发布机构] Rice University
[效力级别] [学科分类]
[关键词] [时效性]